
If you were diagnosed with bowel cancer and were scheduled for tumour removal and a gut resection would you instinctively choose food like this for your healing and recovery? Actually – would you ever choose food like this?
Meal suggestions
Snacks for between meals
A close relative of one of the ANH-Intl team is being faced with such a nutritional dilemma in a major UK NHS hospital. But luckily is one of the few informed consumers that knows better than to follow these frankly terrifying nutritional guidelines from the dieticians at the hospital.

Some of you may have taken a sharp intake of breath reading the abbreviated list above, but it's only when you read the full booklet (unfortunately unavailable online) given to patients with bowel cancer that you realise what a truly heinous crime against humanity is being waged by UK dieticians. Their recommendations defy most logic, common sense and the call of our DNA — let alone the science. Patients are encouraged to eat foods high in sugar, fat and dairy in an attempt to increase calories and told to "avoid filling yourself up with large servings of vegetables, salads, water and fizzy drinks as they give bulk but are low in calories and protein"! Fizzy drinks, at least we can agree on something.
Other tips include eating little and often, what you want and when you want it, treating yourself to your favourite foods and having a glass of sherry, brandy or any alcohol before a meal to stimulate your appetite. If that's not bad enough, words really begin to fail us at the imperative to "add glucose powder, sugar or honey to drinks, fruit juice, puddings, porridge etc. And to use syrup and honey on bread or puddings". Ahem, weren't these recommendations for patients with bowel cancer recovering from surgery? And aren't there well established links between sugar, processed food, lack of fibre and phytonutrients and colorectal cancer?
In case you think we're making this up you can take a look at similar guidelines from another two UK NHS sources we've found online:
NHS Derby City and NHS Derbyshire County: Big Nutrition for Small Appetites: getting a lot out of a little
Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals: Making the Most of Every Mouthful
This seems to be standard dietetic fodder recommended to many different groups of patients. You may like to remind yourself of our earlier feature this year on the differences between dieticians and nutritional therapists and revisit the horrifying nutritional guidelines for cancer patients from London's Royal Marsden hospital.
Apart from loading the sick and vulnerable with saturated fat, simple carbohydrates, gluten and sugar, the other common recommendation is to make your own 'fortified or enriched milk' and use it ubiquitously. It's a simple innocuous looking recipe to the uninformed, consisting of 1 pint of full cream milk with 4 tablespoons of dried milk powder added to it. For a little extra 'enrichment' — it's all about getting those calories in — you can also use evaporated milk or double cream for further 'enrichment' of cereals and puddings. Apparently fortified milk is one of the best ways to increase your caloric and protein intake. What happened to simple chicken and fish? Two of the most easily digested proteins that carry very little risk for an inappropriate gut response or creating further inflammation in an already wounded intestine.
Is this really an innocuous healthy food? What about our ability to digest milk and dairy products? Milk is one of the most well known foods allergens through either an allergy to the cow's milk protein or a deficiency of lactase to digest the predominant sugar, lactose. Reactions can be swift (30 mins to 2 hours after eating) and include a range of symptoms from nausea, cramps, bloating and gas to diarrhoea. Whilst these are unpleasant, they are not considered life threatening, but what people fail to realise is that they are still a source of intense inflammation. And inflammation is one of the key foundation stones of chronic disease.
Many people don't realise that they have a problem with a food allergen such as lactose. And also don't realise that it's hidden in so many foods, such as bread, baked goods, processed breakfast cereals, instant potato mash, margarine, lunch meats, sweets and sugary snacks, mixes for pancakes, biscuits and cookies and powdered meal-replacements — actually pretty much most of the recommendations from the dieticians!

In the world that has spawned modern medicine, everyone has a specific job and within that job, specific tasks. In the case of the oncologist, the task is to treat or remove the cancer to the best of the oncologist’s ability. The oncologist knows that people who have important tissues, organs or parts of organs removed from their bodies are very sick people. These sick people have little appetite or may find it difficult to eat. They are therefore at great risk of losing weight. The dietician is called in to address this problem — and this problem alone. The dietician is not asked to provide food that helps healing — food that is low in simple carbohydrates and sugars, yet is rich in anti-inflammatory botanical nutrients and proteins, amino acids, fibres, vitamins and minerals to enhance healing in the body and even help address possible underlying causes that might have given rise to the cancer in the first place.
As a result, the kind of advice being dished out by dieticians in many hospitals is simply a stopgap, weight-gain-at-any-cost dietary regime. It’s all about maximising calorie intake, even if the foods containing those calories might be proven to give rise to increased risk of cancer if consumed long-term. And of course the ties between Big Food and the dietetic associations round the world is well known. Sadly, unprocessed wholefoods, vegetables and fruits don't put much money into the coffers of Big Food, whose very large and unmistakable footprint is visible through most dietetic advice.
It’s a sad fact that many people will have to look elsewhere for good advice that is informed by a more complete understanding of how foods, eating habits and lifestyles interact with a damaged and stressed body. Preventing weight loss is rather more about balancing physical activity with the right amounts of nutrients, consumed at the right times, to help bring the complex interacting metabolic, endocrine, immune and nervous systems back into balance.
The gut is already the most challenged set of tissues in the body given that we ingest 30 – 50 tonnes of antigenic ('non-us') material in a lifetime. Each time we eat, we create inflammation and our immune cells in the gut have to work overtime. The immune system in our gut is challenged more in one day than the rest of our immune system in a lifetime. As such, our gut health is determined on the ability to come back to a normal non-inflamed set-point after each challenge. Hence, consistently challenging the gut with pro-inflammatory or allergenic foods is just setting one up for a future health crisis. If your gut is happy and healthy, so will you be. And that is why it makes no sense to advise patients in their vulnerable recovery state to consume the very foods that have likely contributed to their colorectal cancer in the first place.

Food4Health Campaign
ANH Europe homepage
Updated: 13 Jun 2012
For our FREE Newsletter.
Thank goodness my mother choose to use her own intuition when feeding herself after bowel cancer surgery. She ate more or less the types of foods that have been recommended in this excellent piece. My mother had her tumour removed when she was 79. She is now 82, walks our collie regularly, and cooks a Sunday roast every week for her family. She made this recovery without the aid of bucket loads of sugar!
Additionally, my mother is a strong believer in eating offal, liver, kidney.....Not a commonly eaten food now, but perhaps should be seriously considered for a recovery phase as it is packed with protein, nucleotide nutritional building blocks, iron....
Lovely commentary - a question arises how can such antithetical advice be sponsored by a government agency? If you wanted a cancer case to deteriorate do you know of a better way, apart from ingesting plutonium?
I find it hard to accept any thinking nutritional advisor - anywhere - is unaware of the connection between sugar and cancer. Unless they are being deliberately misled, hoodwinked, misinformed, brainwashed, coerced ....
What motive could there be for deliberately spreading such misinformation? This is beyond pharma profiteering - it kills the geese laying their golden eggs.
The only answer I can divine is that there is an agenda to "cull the population" - not an easy idea to contemplate but one which has occured throughout human history to the deranged and demented.
Impossible? Look back only a decade or two and see what was thought "impossible" then has become fact today.
I have come to accept that these are but the outer signs of a global eugenics-like program. The bright side is that if you are willing to learn about health and take responsibility for your own then you are naturally immune.
At this stage.
Fergus Reilly PhD, Middle Path Natural Health
http://middlepath.com.au
I completely endorse what you say here. I regularly see patients with cancer - I practice Chinese medicine - and they are told similarly dangerous rubbish. One woman struggling with appetite and digestion after chemotherapy and had lost some weight was told to eat.......sausages, crisps and chocolate by her dietician and oncologist. Hard to believe in 2012.
Sorry - you cant have nuts,celery, cucumber in the soluble and insoluble fibre lista
I stayed in an NHS hospital for 3 weeks last year while on holiday. The foods mentioned above are very much what was served on a daily basis in said hospital. Part of the problem is that the NHS has very little to budget with as far as feeding people (less than 5 pounds per day/person). Fresh fruits and vegetables were minimal, and thankfully my visitors brought fresh fruit in as gifts (flowers are no longer allowed in UK hospitals). Vegetables were only served at dinner time and then cooked very soft. Also, the only vegetables that were served other than peas and carrots were generally cruciferous - broccoli, cauliflower, brussel sprouts, and cabbage. I think one has to be careful blaming the NHS entirely as those raised in the UK eat very much as is described above. Sweets are a big part of daily life and are generally inexpensive. Unless fruits and vegetables are "in season" selection can be quite limited. Finally citizens are less likely to change their diets for health reasons. As a culture they are very stuck in their ways and perhaps dieticians are trying to change this up slowly. If you were to stick a booklet that told people what they really needed to be eating in their hands...most would throw it in the trash. I think the answers lay in educating the young and providing suitable snacks at school so that a child's palate becomes used to a variety of flavours and textures. As a Canadian, I am appalled by what is recommended above, but as someone who is also British born, I do understand how difficult it must be to change the thinking and eating patterns of an entire culture. It is too late to amend the ways of those that are generally dealing with cancers of this nature, but it is imperative that children be taught the correct way one nourishes the body. Even then it may take a number of generations to turn the tide.
Thank goodness for the sanity of the ANH. When I win the lottery I will donate lots to this very sound and sensible cause!!!
Post new comment